There is no lack of "news" headlines on the Internet attempting to spin the Pope's "climate change" encyclical into a political groove.
From USA Today - Pope's climate change statement a challenge for Republicans.
Desmogblog writes - Republican Presidential Candidates Attack Pope’s Climate Change Encyclical
And from Huffington Post - Right Wing Steamed Over Pope's Climate Change Encyclical
Hoping to divide Republicans, Democrats are overjoyed that GOP Catholics more convinced about climate change than other Republicans.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has even gone so far as to say, "We really must listen to his Holiness as we go forward.".
Are the Democrats ready to embrace Pope Francis and his encyclical, Laudato si completely?
Is Pelosi, fellow CINO John Kerry, and Democrat Presidential favorite, Hillary Clinton ready to accept what is written concerning abortion in Laudato si ?
nationaljournal.com quotes the papal encyclical:
"Since everything is interrelated, concern for the protection of nature is also incompatible with the justification of abortion. How can we genuinely teach the importance of concern for other vulnerable beings, however troublesome or inconvenient they may be, if we fail to protect a human embryo, even when its presence is uncomfortable and creates difficulties?"
Another bothersome quote for Democrats:
Instead of resolving the problems of the poor and thinking of how the world can be different,
some can only propose a reduction in the birth rate. At times, developing countries face forms of
international pressure which make economic assistance contingent on certain policies of
"reproductive health". Yet "while it is true that an unequal distribution of the population and of
available resources creates obstacles to development and a sustainable use of the environment, it must nonetheless be recognized that demographic growth is fully compatible with an integral and shared development." To blame population growth instead of extreme and selective
consumerism on the part of some, is one way of refusing to face the issues.
I've read Pope Francis' latest encyclical and I've found nothing in it that I can object to. I'm not a scientist by any stretch of the imagination, so my thoughts on whether the planet is experiencing anthropogenic climate change involves a certain amount of trust in "authorities". I trust Al Gore, Nancy Pelosi, President Obama and their ilk about as far as I can hurl the planet Earth, but I don't put much faith in the scientific views of Rush Limbaugh or Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe either.
Is the Earth warming? If so, is that warming due, in large part to human activity? I have absolutely no proof one way or the other, but I trust Pope Francis more than anyone else speaking on the issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment