I've written about the Matthew 25 Network before. [Obama and the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. ] For those of you are unfamiliar with the group, they are 527 PAC whose goal is to give Barack Obama a Christian face by concentrating on other "Christian" values while sugar-coating Obama's pro abortion stance.
The group claims to be made up of Christians of all denominations who support political candidates who heed Christ's words from the 25th chapter of the book of Matthew,
"For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, a stranger and you welcomed me, naked and you clothed me, ill and you cared for me, in prison and you visited me."
I've just finished reading the 25th chapter of Matthew and by following the link you can read it as well. I could not find anything in it that could even remotely justify abortion....much less the infanticide Obama supported by his voting against the Illinois version of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act (BAIPA).
According to this reuters article,
"U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama side-stepped a pointed query about abortion on Saturday by 'mega-pastor' Rick Warren during a televised forum.Asked at what point a baby gets “human rights,” Obama, who strongly supports abortion rights, said: '… whether you’re looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity … is above my pay grade' ”.
He must have a very low pay grade.....he cannot see that a human life begins at conception. He won't even recognize that human life begins at birth if that recognition, somehow, endangers Roe vs Wade.
Obama cannot hide from his voting record in the Illinois state Senate. Trying to justify his inhuman record in regards to the BAIPA , Obama claims that his lack of support for the Illinois version was due to it not containing a "neutrality clause" to insure that it would not be in opposition to Roe vs Wade. This new claim is an outright lie as records show the state Senate bill did, indeed, carry the, so called, "neutrality clause".
Anyone who believes that I'm spreading lies against the 'anointed one' need only follow the evidence.